Persecution Chic

It's an unexamined article of faith (literally) for most "Evangelicals" that they will be persecuted.  And we know Jesus did promise many times that those who follow Him will be persecuted (Matthew 10:16-23, for example: verified in II Timothy 3:12, and elsewhere).

It seems one of those true teachings of Jesus that we like to hear backwards: from our end of His teaching.  Jesus says His followers will be persecuted.  We hear instead that persecution proves we are Jesus' followers...glorifying us.

If Jesus' teaching worked the backwards way we want to hear it, the greatest Christians in America the last two centuries were the early Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses in World War I, and Topeka's Westboro Baptist Church today.  Persecution does not prove who is Jesus' true follower.

It's pride that we hear Jesus that way, of course.  Who wouldn't be proud of being persecuted, if persecution proves you are following Jesus ?

Self-deception is also necessarily involved, enabling pride.  Any human being convinced he has anything in himself to be proud of has to overlook a lot of contrary evidence.  But self-deception can make that evidence disappear, or minimize it sufficiently to let us convince ourselves we are a "good" person.

That judgement is God's alone: and His judgement is the only one that actually matters.  But self-deception, well- and long-practiced, can even satisfy us we meet God's standard.  And how much more could we convince ourselves it's so, than if we are being persecuted, as Jesus said His followers would be ?

There's consequently a kind of "persecution chic" among Evangelicals: a desire to be persecuted, and a desire to be seen as persecuted.  Why wouldn't there be ?  It plays exactly to our cherished pride and self-deception.  It "baptizes" pride and self-deception as adjuncts of our Christianity...rather than treating them as enemies that must be painfully and radically eradicated from our hearts.

Ordinary American Christians...to this point...have always had incredibly easy faith-lives: there's very little actual persecution anyone can point to.  But the "fake news" technique works for persecution the same way it works for event-Truth  and scripture-Truth: it can be manufactured by interpretation.

Philippians 1:15 attests that there have always been some "preaching Christ even from envy and strife."  There are still Christians who are obnoxious jerks (my observation is that their flawed lives usually go hand-in-hand with flawed doctrine).  And I've heard more than a few of them boast of being persecuted for witnessing Christ.

I'm skeptical of that interpretation.  People usually hate obnoxious jerks because they're obnoxious jerks.

Lacking a personal persecution merit-badge, many ordinary American Christians have embraced the interpretational class-action persecution of a "War on Christmas."

And there actually are occasional instances of an obnoxious jerk, atheist or Jewish or Muslim, who makes a public cause of his outrage at the "Merry Christmas !" banner in the local public high school.  Even more, there's a perception that "political correctness" forbids saying "Merry Christmas."  "Perception," because I've seen no verifiable evidence that supports the belief "they won't let us say that anymore."  (But who needs evidence for their perception, when the lie has assured us every one of the past eight Christmases that President Obama's issued an executive order forbidding Americans to say "Merry Christmas.")

Pressed on what they've suffered from the "War on Christmas," most Christians will say they're persecuted in being denied their "religious rights."

Never mind that "Christmas" is not really, in any historical view, a Christian holiday.  Or that most American atheists and Jews (and even some acculturated Muslims) celebrate Christmas. Or that their sloganeering insistence that "Jesus is the Reason for the Season" shows deceived Christians realize Jesus is tangential to most Americans' perception of the holiday.

That "The War on Christmas" specifically targets Christians is questionable.  That it is "persecution" in any sense seems whining exaggeration, and nothing at all that Jesus meant by "persecution."  Has any American been tortured for celebrating Christmas, or ostracized by family and community ?  Has anyone been sentenced to jail, or to death, for saying "Merry Christmas" ?

And we'd be rightly skeptical that any such things could ever happen.  Society only persecutes those at odds with it.  Would an American actually be persecuted for celebrating Christmas, when America loves its Christmas ?


If the "persecution" of "The War on Christmas" comes down to Christians being denied their "freedom of religion:" did Jesus consider being denied our "rights" is "persecution" ?  Did He promise us "freedom of religion"...or was that the American constitution ?  Most importantly: did Jesus command us to "stand up for our rights" ?

It's a political matter, not a Christian one.  (And even as a political matter, only relevant to Christians of a single nation for the past couple centuries, not to the universal Body of Christ in all times and all nations.)  But "The War on Christmas" (and "political correctness" generally) has been a very successful political deception aimed at Christians, because it casts "our rights" as Jesus' teaching.  Most American Christians don't love Truth enough to notice the lie.

It succeeds because it plays to the spiritual pathology of American Christians' "persecution chic."  We have not suffered for Christ's sake: certainly not for speaking Truth, as He IS: but we can yet convince ourselves (or let political deceivers convince us) that "our rights" have been denied us.

Our "right" to say "Merry Christmas," for example.  And if an anecdotal someone, somewhere, is occasionally brave enough to say they find that greeting insensitive in some contexts, we can throw an angry "Merry Christmas !!" in their face to show we will not be denied our "rights."  But more importantly, we can be proud of being persecuted...exactly as Jesus said His true followers would be.

Like a Roaring Lion

Be of sober spirit, be on the alert. Your adversary, the devil, prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour.       --  I Peter 5:8, my emphasis

Like a roaring lion and a rushing bear Is a wicked ruler over a poor people.   --  Proverbs 28:15

There is a conspiracy of her prophets in her midst like a roaring lion tearing the prey. They have devoured lives; they have taken treasure and precious things; they have made many widows in the midst of her...Her princes within her are like wolves tearing the prey, by shedding blood and destroying lives in order to get dishonest gain. Her prophets have smeared whitewash for them, seeing false visions and divining lies for them, saying, ‘Thus says the Lord God,’ when the Lord has not spoken.       --  Ezekiel 22:25, 27-28

Scripture characterizes the devil as "like a roaring lion."  That's also scripture's characterization of evil rulers, and of false prophets.  Both kinds of men share satan's own nature.

Revelation tells us satan will work his purposes in the end-times through an evil ruler supported by evil religious leaders: scripture's "roaring lions" colluding in their father's work.

These may or may not be the end-times.  But we know satan is working today, and should probably expect he's working the same way now that he has throughout history, and will in the end-times.

Plans for the inauguration a few days hence are that, when Donald Trump becomes our ruler, a set of his hand-picked "faith leaders" will be there to bless his presidency.

So be of sober spirit, be on the alert. Your adversary, the devil, prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour.

Let those who have ears to hear, hear.

Disposable Jesus

Another relevant re-post from 2011.

---------------------------------------------------------------

Stephen Prothero published a thoughtful blog on our culture's "disposable Jesus."

http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2011/05/11/my-take-poll-on-bin-ladens-death-reveals-a-disposable-jesus/?hpt=C2

One of his examples is the "Golden Rule:" most Americans say they believe we should treat others as we would want to be treated ourselves (though that's not just a Christian teaching).  Even when specifically applied, a small majority agreed that we should not do anything to enemies that we would not want done to American soldiers.

But less than half of white evangelicals agreed to that belief.  "In other words," observes Prothero, for a majority of white evangelicals, "when Jesus said, 'So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets' (Matthew 7:12), He didn’t really mean 'everything.'  He thought there should be an exception in the case of waterboarding your enemies."

This is what Prothero calls our "disposable Jesus:" the operative attitude that Jesus is not so much the sovereign Head of the Church as a useful pawn for OUR opinions...and can be ignored when He contradicts them.  I'd add that this attitude also manifests itself in the treatment of truth (who Jesus said He IS), particularly among followers of the politicized Church.

I have limited interest in heresy-hunting, and the conspiracy-mindedness that goes with it.  Heresies and conspiracies are certainly both "out there."   But time spent searching them out seems to me a complete waste, and conspiracy-mindedness is forbidden to us (Isaiah 8).

I doubt that conspiracies, even those which are real (most aren't), mislead and destroy anywhere near as many Christians as does "disposable Jesus" thinking.

It's again a question of thinking in Kingdom terms.  In the Kingdom, the King's word is law.

Amen !!

Where We Shop

Chuck Colson's remarks about Ayn Rand raise a question.

I'm appalled at where many Christians "shop" for ideas.  We have Jesus' Own endorsement of scripture: that God's word is truth (John 17:17).

. . . Why would CHRISTIANS shop anywhere else ?

Yet many "Christian" websites and e-mails endorse and promote ideas from controversialist and partisan sources.  The general run of "Christian" information pressed on me daily as "the Christian view" traces back not to the Bible, but to Ayn Rand, Glenn Beck, Fox News, WorldNetDaily, Rush Limbaugh, Breitbart News, anonymous "conservative" bloggers, and even less Godly sources (if such a thing can be imagined).

In the nature of our form of government...more importantly, in the nature of spiritual warfare...it's a given that manipulative lies will exist.  In the nature of mankind, there will always be those who CHOOSE to believe and promote such lies.

The question is why so many CHRISTIANS are among them ?

Ultimately, the only answer is because they choose to.  Receiving "the love of the truth so as to be saved" (II Thessalonians 2:10) is a choice.

When we want shoes, we go to a shoe-store.  We go to a candy-store when we've decided we want to buy candy.  We shop in a place where we can find what it is we want to buy.

Christians who "shop" for their operative ideas someplace else than the Bible show they're not really looking for Truth.   When they CHOOSE instead to browse the shelves in places where lies are sold, it's because they want to buy lies.  They will find what they are looking for, and they will "buy" it.

God guarantees so: "For this reason God will send upon them a deluding influence so that they will believe what is false..." (II Thessalonians 2:11)

Chuck Colson on Ayn Rand

The next two posts are from a former blog.  Posted in 2011, they still seem relevant today.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Several years ago, Chuck Colson was already warning about the attack on Christianity in America represented by "conservative" leaders' embrace of Ayn Rand's "philosophy:" a warning he posted on a hard-core "conservative" website. That attack continues: most recently embodied in the 2012 budget formulated by Representative Paul Ryan, an avid follower of Rand's ideas.  Ronald Reagan, the "conservative" idol, also testified to Rand's influence on his thinking, as have many other "conservative" leaders.

Colson's remarks are worth re-reading.

http://townhall.com/columnists/chuckcolson/2007/10/16/the_legacy_of_ayn_rand/page/full/

"In his new memoir, former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan reminds us that author Ayn Rand is still influencing the world. He credits her with turning him into something more than a 'math junkie.'

"Greenspan is not alone. A 1991 Book-of-the-Month Club and Library of Congress survey asked members which book had most influenced their lives. As expected, the Bible finished first. Unexpectedly, Rand’s most famous book, the novel Atlas Shrugged, finished second.

"Fifty years after its publication and 25 years after Rand’s death, Atlas Shrugged is still read everywhere from college campuses to Wall Street. Given its popularity and its impact, Christians ought to be acquainted with Rand’s work and, especially, her worldview.

"As theologian John Piper puts it, Rand’s work manifests a 'complete rejection of a divine or supernatural dimension to reality.' The absence of God causes Rand to get human nature wrong as well.

"In Atlas Shrugged and her other writings, Rand articulated a philosophy she called 'objectivism.' Among other things, objectivism teaches that man’s 'highest value' and 'moral purpose' is his own happiness.

"By 'happiness' Rand meant 'rational self-interest.' For her, 'virtue' consisted of doing what 'secured' your life and well-being.

"Where did that leave altruism and self-sacrifice? As vices. For Rand, altruism and self-sacrifice represented a betrayal of what should be a person’s 'highest values,' that is, his life and well-being. Similarly, justice would be possible only where you never sought for nor granted unearned or undeserved results, 'neither in matter nor in spirit . . .'

"But without altruism and self-sacrifice, how do people relate to one another? Ayn Rand says through exchanges that promote mutual advantage, what she called a 'trade.' In other words, as if each of the parties were businesses, not people.

"Rand’s inversion of biblical norms had predictable results: Scott Ryan, who wrote a book on Rand’s philosophy, called objectivism a 'psychologically totalitarian personality cult that allowed Rand . . . to exercise personal power over [her] unwitting victims.' He cites, for example, the way she manipulated 'her own unemployed and dependent husband' to get him to agree for her to have 'an adulterous sexual affair.'

"We’re not talking here about personal flaws or merely human weaknesses. As Ryan puts it, these abuses are 'demonstrably connected to Rand’s own "philosophical" premises'—that is, her worldview.

"Rand and her followers, you see, lived in a way consistent with her worldview. But you can hardly regard a philosophy that exalts selfishness and condemns altruism as the basis for a good society.

"That’s why it is so important for us as Christians to understand our Christian worldview and to be able to contend for it, because it gets God right, and it gets human nature right, as well. You can find that worldview in the one book that out-ranked Atlas Shrugged."

For the Non-Spiritual

I've been entirely one-sided in my comments.  I've thought of my audience...admittedly a very, very tiny audience...as people who know scripture, and listen to hear the Spirit.  So I haven't tried to address any others.

But that's not God's way.  He sends rain on the just and the unjust.  He sent His Truth into the world, to rub shoulders with the righteous and unrighteous.

He acts that way in mercy.  In the world as He's created it, the unjust can't live without rain.  Even those who love lies want their car-mechanic to tell them the truth when he says he repaired those dangerous brakes; and the doctor, when he says there's no cancer.

God puts "clues" out there, even for those who don't read scripture, or listen to the Spirit.  Reality itself reflects Him, in ordinary experience, to those who will pay attention to His "clues:" even if we want to believe those are "natural," or "secular."

So this post is addressed to the Non-Spiritual, especially the Christians among them.  This is one of God's "secular" clues to you:

what did you expect from a sleazy New York businessman ?