Monday, November 06, 2017
Cooking Lobsters
Scientists say it's actually a myth that cooking a lobster by placing them in cold water, then very s-l-o-w-l-y increasing the temperature to boiling, kills them without them becoming aware of what is happening to them.
But it works very well for human beings, as to moral temperature.
There was another mass-shooting yesterday. In our recent history, America has a mass-shooting every few weeks. So far most Americans still perceive mass-shootings as wrong...though a great many Americans have adapted the political belief that it's a constitutional "right" that virtually everyone can have almost any kind of military firearm they want.
The N.R.A. and its followers go so far as to say everyone should...to protect themselves from mass-shooters. "The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun," you know. Never mind that "good guys" with a gun...and grudges (personal or political), mental problems, anger-issues, or personal problems...are most often the ones who become mass-shooters.
But my point isn't the gun-debate. The point is that Americans are increasingly coming to accept that a mass-shooting every few weeks is normative.
When Charles Whitman went on a killing-rampage in 1966 (including some military-grade weapons in his arsenal), everyone in America was horrified at the outrage of his murders. Even when children and teachers at Sandy Hook were massacred (again with military-grade firearms), not quite 5 years ago, most of us could still feel outrage at the evil of their murder. Today, not really so much: every successive mass-shooting is lamentable...but isn't our attitude that that's just the way it is in our present-day society ?
Nothing better illustrates that political heat increases moral insensibility than the fact that Texas legislators put in place a law making it legal for almost everyone in Texas to own military-assault weapons on August 1st, 2016: the 50th anniversary of Charles Whitman's murderous rampage. "Conservative" legislators wanted to "strengthen" Texans' "Second Amendment rights."
Under that strong "Second-Amendment rights" law, the most-recent Texas shooter seems to have legally possessed his murder-weapons.
Will the next mass-shooting (and I'm certain there will be one again, soon) shock us as much as the one yesterday ? Will it be the one after that, or the next, or the one after the next, before it all comes to seem rather boring...or only notable as proof that our constitutional "rights" are secure and strong ?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)