Calvin on Evil Rulers

                                                                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                                              

I very definitely have no dog in doctrinal disputes about Calvin's teachings.  I'm not even sure what anti-Calvinists are called, beyond "anti-Calvinists."  It's never really seemed a necessary part of my life in Christ to research and decide and declare if I'm a Calvinist or an anti-.

The formal theology associated with Calvin's name is doubtless flawed: that's only what we should expect of anyone's theology, including our own.  Believing any human mind can substantially encompass the reality of God is a first step toward idolatry...taken in pride.  None of us can, and none of us do.  So I'm also pretty sure the theology of Calvinism's opponents is just as flawed.

It seems a mistake to follow either to the extent we identify by one "side's" name, or by the other's.  Taking "sides" in theology is the same as taking "sides" in politics, football, nationalism, or any of the other human constructs to which men give their allegiance: that is to say, idols.

"Taking sides," or "factions," is not a fruit of Christ's Spirit any more than idolatry is.  Galatians 5:20 says "dividings" or "factions" grow from our flesh.  The Greek word there for "dividings" is haireseis, from which we get our English word "heresy."

The rhetorical question in I Corinthians 1:13 affirms that Christ is not divided.  Since Jesus identified Himself as "the Truth" (John 14:6), Christians, above all other people, must believe that "the Truth" is not divided.  There are no "sides" in Truth, no "your Truth" and "my Truth:" and the only "anti-" connected with it is denial of Truth.  The latter is what Jesus said is the distinguishing character of "the father of lies" (john 8:44).

Quoting Calvin here has nothing to do with identifying as a Calvinist or an anti-Calvinist.  I cite Calvin because I consider he speaks scriptural truth.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"We are not only subject to the authority of princes who perform their office toward us uprightly and faithfully as they ought, but also to the authority of all who, by whatever means, have got control of affairs...that whoever they may be, they have their authority solely from him....they who rule unjustly and incompetently have been raised up by him to punish the wickedness of the people; that all equally have been endowed with that holy majesty with which he has invested lawful power....a wicked king is the Lord’s wrath upon the earth...thus nothing more would be said of a [wicked] king than of a robber who seizes your possessions, of an adulterer who pollutes your marriage bed, or of a murderer who seeks to kill you. For Scripture reckons all such calamities among God’s curses. But...In a very wicked man utterly unworthy of all honor, provided he has the public power in his hands, that noble and divine power resides which the Lord has by his Word given to the ministers of his justice and judgment. Accordingly, he should be held in the same reverence and esteem by his subjects, in so far as public obedience is concerned, in which they would hold the best of kings if he were given to them.”

                                   --  John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion, Book 4, Chapter 20, Section 25

 
"He now commends to us obedience to princes...that the Lord has designed in this way to provide for the tranquillity of the good, and to restrain the waywardness of the wicked...for except the fury of the wicked be resisted, and the innocent be protected from their violence, all things would come to an entire confusion...

For since a wicked prince is the Lord’s scourge to punish the sins of the people, let us remember, that it happens through our fault that this excellent blessing of God is turned into a curse.”
 

                                  --  John Calvin, Commentary on Romans  (Chapter 13, vv. 3-4)

                                                                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                                              

Going the Wrong Way

                                                                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                                              

When the teaching started going around that Christians should be involved in politics, I rejected it.  It was an obvious ploy by the "Moral Majority" of the late '70s to trump up Christian support for Republicans.  Having become a Christian during the Watergate days, I was deeply skeptical that Christians should take political "sides"...especially with the "side" that gave us the most corrupt and destructive government in our history...to that point.

I was...and am...impressed that Galatians 5:20 lists "factions" (Greek haireseis, literally, "dividings") as a work of the flesh.  It was hard to see how the "Moral Majority" and its (quickly-burgeoning) imitators were not such "factions," involving themselves as they did in the worldly power-mechanics of human governments.  New factions springing up is how politics works: but introducing a "dividing" in the Church wounds the Body of Christ.

I was also skeptical that the goal of worldly political power was one Christians should pursue: it seems a serious mis-reading of Jesus' mandate to seek FIRST the Kingdom of God.

The 1980 election confirmed my suspicions.  The major candidates were a staunch Christian and a self-proclaimed "conservative."  The "Christian Conservative" faction delivered its votes overwhelmingly to the "conservative."  It showed where the heart of that faction truly lay, and still does.

But my view has become a bit more Biblically-nuanced in the last 40 years.

I'm more convinced than ever that "Christian conservatism" is an unscriptural faction (unless I've missed some important admonition by Jesus that His followers be "conservative"); and that human political power has no part in enacting the Kingdom of God.  There is no scriptural mandate I'm aware of that we should seek first (or at all) involvement in the human politics of this world's kingdoms.

But that world is where our life takes place, and politics is part of that world.  If we believe Jesus is "Lord" of all things, He is Lord of all that world, and all its human activities, including politics.  It's not our priority to seek; but in their contacts with and responses to the world's politics, Christians should manifest Jesus' rule even that enemy realm.

And there's the problem.

A tourist in Ireland was driving cross-country, and had become lost on a country road.  Seeing a farmer working on his fence, he pulled to the side of the road, and called,

"Excuse me.  Is this the road to Dublin ?"

The farmer paused to look down the road...and turned to look down it the other direction.  Then he looked at the tourist.

"Aye, 'tis," said the farmer.  "But ye're goin' the wrong way."

American Christians' mandate is to manifest Jesus' Lordship, even in the world's political realm.  But for 40 years American Christians have been going the wrong way.