Saturday, September 30, 2017
Joseph Smith the Deceiver
Everything I've read by Fawn Brodie has impressed me. She was a rigorously honest historian, and a graceful stylist.
On a cruise this week, I've had a chance to re-read her first book, No Man Knows My History, the first biography of the "prophet" Joseph Smith which was neither Mormon hagiography nor biased anti-Mormon invective. Brodie, a non-practicing Mormon herself, searched the historical documents of the LDS and RLDS archives, and affidavits collected by the earliest crusaders against Mormonism, subjecting both to the same strict examination.
The picture of Joseph Smith which emerges is not at all flattering. Brodie gives Smith credit for his charismatic personality and his imagination, his attractive playfulness and his forceful oratory. But she doesn't soft-play his earlier career as an unsuccessful treasure-hunter, his continued failed attempts to enrich himself (often at the expense of his followers), and his child-like craving for attention and grandeur.
Brodie came to the conclusion that Smith's theology, and his "Golden Bible," were products of his personality, and not revelations from God. She was subsequently excommunicated by the "Saints," and her work attacked by Mormon historians.
In the over-70 years since publication, Brodie revised the biography once, and some of her conclusions (for example, the identity of Joseph Smith's children by various "plural marriages") have been challenged, sometimes successfully, by new evidence. But she rigorously documented Smith's immature egotism, and how it manifested in the "Book of Mormon" and his theology.
Smith at various time showed disdain for his own "Golden Bible." When the cornerstone of the temple in Nauvoo was being laid, he placed in it the remaining original copy of the Book of Mormon, saying "I have had trouble enough with this thing," shocking one of his priestly witnesses (p.276). One of his former high officials (albeit a particularly slippery one) who left the church later claimed that Smith proposed to him a plan to have plates engraved that he could exhibit for a fee as the original plates from which the Book of Mormon was translated (p. 316-7).
Brodie documents well the most fascinating fact of her subject, Smith's transformation from petty frontier con-man to prophet of God's new faith. He himself seemed at first to be amazed to find his revelations believed (much like Donald Trump's amazement that he could "...stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn’t lose voters"). He called his followers to their faces "...the greatest dupes, as a body of people, who ever lived..." (pp. 295-6). To another visitor who remarked on the absolute power he held in Nauvoo, he agreed no man could be entrusted with unlimited power; but added in "a rich, comical aside" (said the visitor) "Remember, I am a prophet !" (ibid)
The tragedy for Joseph Smith, and his followers, was that he eventually came to believe his own deceptions, to the point that Brodie characterizes him as "...fully intoxicated with power and drunk with visions of empire and apocalyptic glory" (p. 354). When he set out the "articles of faith" of Mormonism, one was that "the Book of Mormon [is] the word of God." And he came to fully believe that he was himself God's sovereign ruling authority on earth, whose word supplanted all previous religious doctrines. Another "article of faith," for example, was that "...men will be punished for their own sins, and not for Adam's transgression" (pp. 277-8).
Smith led his followers in self-deception (or let's say "hypocrisy"). After he'd been teaching "plural marriage" to his inner circle for some years, word leaked out. Smith not only denied to the world that he and the "Saints" were practicing polygamy, he solicited affidavits from his people testifying there was no polygamy. And he got them: not only from his high officials who already had "plural wives," but even from the parents of a 17-year old girl who were witnesses to their daughter's marriage to Smith only months before (pp. 320-1).
But the famous "revelation" that God commands the practice of polygamy was far from the most heretical of Smith's teachings. (That revelation was nullified as God's abiding word for Mormons when a later "Prophet" heard God reject polygamy...conveniently, when polygamy was the issue blocking Utah from being admitted as a state of the United States.) His greatest heresies were yet to come.
In the King Follett funeral sermon he declared that "God himself was once as we are now, and is an exalted man...:" the "Adam-God" theology that Mormon leader Lorenzo Snow summarized, "As man now is, God once was: as God now is, man may be;” which Mormonism still teaches (p. 366). In an argument with one of his authorities who opposed the church' "debauchery," he exclaimed "...we can all go to hell together and convert it into a heaven by casting the Devil out ! Hell is by no means the place the world of fools suppose it to be, but on the contrary, it is quite an agreeable place" (p. 370).
But more than re-defining God Himself, and hell, Smith's theology was most about glorifying himself. In one of his last sermons, he proclaimed, "I have more to boast of than any man ever had. I am the only man that has ever been able to keep a whole church together since the days of Adam...I boast that no man ever did such a work as I..." (p. 374). He clearly considered Jesus a lesser spiritual leader than himself; and his ambitions for secular glory also led him to proclaim himself General of his own Mormon army, and a candidate for President of the United States.
I admire Fawn Brodie;s life-long practice of honest history. And nowhere does her integrity better serve truth than in documenting the spirit of anti-Christ at work in Joseph Smith and his "church" since its founding.
Friday, September 01, 2017
Politics Is Not Really ABOUT Politics
This post is titled with an observation by our brother Tim (Onesimus) in Australia. His blog-posts are consistently insightful and informative: but his above observation is the wisest word I've heard about the relation of politics and Christianity, in my 45 years of observing and pondering their interaction in America.
Yesterday Tim posted the negative comments of a reader who had unsubscribed because his posts were "...very political and you are not even American." (Tim does often comment on the incredible spiritual blindness of American Christians toward their politics: but also about Middle Eastern Christianity and its refugees, Australian news and politics, art, Muslim conversions to Christianity, and much else).
He responded with three points he considers paramount in how Christians look at politics. Those points seem to me spot-on: and the embodiment of exactly what he means, that "politics is not really ABOUT politics."
Tim's full post is at https://onesimusfiles.wordpress.com/ His viewpoints are always worth hearing (even if he is not American).
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"...politics cannot be used to address spiritual realities. For example, righteousness cannot be legislated or enforced, because the lawmakers and enforcers are no less fallible than those they seek to control – even IF those lawmakers and enforcers were religiously devout...
"True justice and righteousness will only ever come through Government on this earth after the return of Jesus, when he reigns over the nations during thousand years commonly known as 'the millennium.'
"Secondly political realities can and MUST be addressed according to the Spirit and not according to national self-interest. The follower of Jesus should be set apart from political rhetoric and partisan allegiances. As believers we need to stand as a CONTRAST to the world’s political expediencies, by representing what serves God and His Kingdom, not being swayed by patriotic fervour, or what we are told are the nation’s interests.
"Our nation’s interests rarely (if ever) reflect God’s interests – and yet, contrarily, God’s interests ALWAYS reflect the best (eternal) interests of the people in ALL nations, not only those where we live.
"Thirdly, our own attitudes and actions should always be informed by truth, an understanding of God’s character and with an eye on God’s overall purposes."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tim's closing paragraph also seemed to me exactly relevant to the way American Christianity was seduced by "conservatives," on the basis of their alleged "pro-life" agenda:
"It is easy to be distracted by single issue agendas – even worthy issues can draw us away from the 'bigger picture.' By focusing on the rightness of that one issue, we can find ourselves being blinded to the wrongness of the larger political agenda being presented. Beautiful gift wrapping can easily disguise a sealed box filled with stinking garbage."
AMEN ! and AMEN !!
Thursday, August 31, 2017
The Wall of Babel
The people decided to build a tower in Babel "whose top will reach into heaven" (Genesis 11:4). They convinced themselves that building bricks and mortar hundreds of feet into the sky would allow them to "reach into" heaven. It's the essential mindset of godlessness: that human beings can, by their own efforts, by natural means, lay hold of spiritual blessing for themselves.
Scripture says their foolish belief that they could seize heaven by building a tower tall enough was based in their desire to "make for ourselves a name" (ibid). Isn't pride always at the heart of godlessness ? Is there anything God hates more than pride ?
I've been thinking this week about one of the first teachings God put directly into my thinking (i.e., "heart"), over 40 years ago: that we have nothing we were not given. And that God is the only Giver of "every good thing given and every perfect gift..." (James 1:17).
I understood from the thought He put in my heart that we are profoundly foolish when we struggle...especially when we struggle in our own strength, and by natural means...to seize blessing. We are foolish as well to struggle to keep possession of His blessing. Blessing is entirely and only in God's gift, at His will: our struggle is with our own ungodliness and pride, which keep us from His will and His blessing.
Our current president continues to insist that his multi-billion dollar border-wall will keep "illegals" from entering America...from taking American jobs, from spreading crime across America, from stealing services and resources that belong to Americans. And many have convinced themselves that building a steel and concrete wall for thousands of miles across the land will keep and protect for Americans God's blessings to America.
Is our border-wall any less an attempt to seize spiritual blessing by our own effort that the tower the people of Babel built, or any less the product of ungodliness and pride.
Is there anything God hates more than man's ungodliness and pride ?
Sunday, August 20, 2017
Praying for North Korea
I've been praying for the people of South Korea. A close friend's family lives in Seoul, 50 miles from the border, and they and all their countrymen are very much on the spot when national leaders start blustering nuclear threats.
I've been praying for the people of North Korea too. They are even more in the cross-hairs.
North Koreans need our prayers, and our pity. They follow a man they've been taught to believe is wise and good, who loves and protects them: even though the un-brainwashed world can see he's a violent egocentric liar. But North Koreans had no say in choosing that kind of leader.
I pray for and pity the people of the United States too: even the ones who did choose that kind of man as America's leader.
Friday, August 11, 2017
Non-controversial
Jesus said "I AM . . . the Truth . . ." (John 14:6).
Nobody then who follows lies and liars is following Jesus.
It's a controversial thing to say today, to politicized American Christians.
It should NOT be.
Wednesday, August 09, 2017
Monty Python on Reality
I remember a Monty Python piece . . .
A grubby industrial city in the north (Leeds, as I recall) had hired a magician to help put up new public housing. One Python, dressed as a magician, was standing in front of a screen on which a film-clip of an apartment-building demolition was played backwards. As the magician waved his wand, a pile of rubble lying on the ground leaped into the air, and formed itself into a tall apartment-building.
In the skit that followed, a resident was being interviewed in his apartment. He extolled the amenities of the magical building, and how much he enjoyed living in Leeds.
The interviewer asked (quoting from memory), "Where did you live before ?"
The resident mentions off-handedly that he formerly lived in the manor-house at his estate in Devon.
"But", says the puzzled interviewer, "Wasn't that much nicer than a one-bedroom apartment in a public-housing block ?"
A quizzical look crosses the resident's face, and the light of thought begins to show in his visage.
"Well, yes," he says, as he seems to suddenly awaken, "Yes, that was ever so much nicer."
Camera-work makes the walls of the apartment seem to slowly lean to the right, slightly out-of-plumb at first, but at a greater and greater angle as the resident comes to his realization, and an ominous loud creaking grows.
The resident and interviewer both rush to the opposite wall, and throw their weight against it.
"NO, NO !" cries the resident, "I like it here much better !" The wall begins to reverse itself toward plumb.
"It's much nicer here ! Much nicer." And the wall returns to vertical.
It's a pointed parable for our time. Reality stands by itself. False realities, peddled by all varieties of con-men, collapse when the victim wakes up and stops believing in them.
The con-man's guiding adage was always that "you can't cheat an honest man."
Today's political landscape of "alternative realities" probably says a lot about the honesty of most people's political thinking.
Saturday, August 05, 2017
"Missing It" in Scripture
I'm amazed that sometimes when I'm meditating on a subject, and do a search to see what the Bible says about it, it doesn't appear in scripture at all, or only rarely.
"Honest" (and "honesty") was one such surprise. It's a quality which seems cognate with, or the foundational heart-attitude of, "righteousness:" which scripture enjoins as one of man's primary duties. But the word only occurs once in the New Testament, in Jesus' parable of the sower, where He explains that the "good soil" on which the seed falls is "an honest and good heart" (Luke 8:15).
More recently, I had that experience when I was looking to see what scripture says about "unrepentance," or the "unrepentant." Scripture often speaks of "repentantance;" again, a primary duty of all men. So I was sure the Bible had some trenchant comments about the contrary attitude and action.
But those words don't appear in scripture at all. To find what the Bible says about unrepentance, I had to re-think my search-terms: what would the Bible call that attitude ? And when I mentioned this quandry to my wife, she came up with the same scriptural terminology I'd settled on: "stiff-necked."
That search-term opened up some scriptures: and I'm still pondering what scripture says.
My take-away was, again, that God's thoughts and God's ways are not our ways and our thoughts (Isaiah 55:8): sometimes not even our search-terms of God's thoughts.
I was reminded of the point my teacher Derek Prince emphasized in his seminal teaching on "Agreeing With God:" to hear, and comprehend, what God is saying, we have to think in God's definitions and God's categories. Experience shows me that I often do not, even when I think I AM. That even when I believe I'm thinking in the right "religious" terms, I can miss God's ways and God's thoughts.
Monday, July 24, 2017
Giving Prophecy: Addenda
I always find it interesting that so many Trump-supporters and "conservatives" are quick to take criticism of "liars" and "evil-doers" as criticism of their leader and their faction. It reminds me of a story I heard in the Navy, about a sailor being court-martialled for striking an officer.
One of the men working beside the accused sailor that day was being questioned about events that led up to the assault. He testified that the accused had told their work-crew, "The next time that stupid son-of-a-bitch gets in my face, I'm gonna punch him out."
The questioner asked, "And how did you know that Seaman Smith was referring to Lieutenant Jones ?"
The witness replied, "Everybody knows, Sir, that Lieutenant Jones is a stupid son-of-a-bitch."
I find it interesting that even the followers of Trump and the "conservatives" know their leaders are "liars" and "evil-doers"
Sunday, July 23, 2017
Giving Prophecy
As we began discussing the book of Zechariah in Sunday School class today, brother Rob said he had to wonder what things we are doing that "make God mad," so much that He would send a prophet to tell us, "Just STOP that !!"
Rob's a good brother, whose honesty I admire a lot: and hearing his question, I felt like God was saying to give him the message I've been hearing from Him. (There's such a thing as doing the right thing at the wrong time or in the wrong way, so I was careful to ask God if I should speak it out right then in class, or tell Rob privately later.)
So after class I caught Rob, and referenced his question. I think I remember, a few hours later, pretty verbatim what God gave me to say. I first urged Rob to discern, as we're commanded to do in scripture, if what I spoke was God's word. Then I told him, "God says, 'My people must stop following liars and workers of unrighteousness, and saying "This is God's way." ' " Then I told him again to discern if this was God's word.
On the face of it, I don't see how "stop following liars and workers of unrighteousness" could be discerned as a word NOT from God's Spirit. Who but God would say that ? Obviously the "father of lies" would not be in the business of telling Christians to NOT listen to his recruiters.
But the biggest discernment problem for Christians in America in these times is discerning anything that touches on politics. Some Christians react strongly against speaking about anything politically controversial: which lets virtually all individual and societal sin off the hook, in a time and a nation where politicians have made everything political. Other Christians are so governed by a factional mindset (which they often self-delude is a "Christian" mindset) that they can only believe any word critical of their faction and its beliefs is the work of the "enemy" faction...and could not possibly be from God.
Probably many American Christians in those two camps would hear the prophecy God gave me as being "political"...which it is. Those who follow Trump and the "conservatives" would hear it as critical of their faction...which it is, though not about their faction only.
The discernment problem I would most foresee is that both the Trumpites and the don't-touchites would be unable to hear God saying anything that didn't fall comfortably within the circle of acceptability they themselves drew.
The reasoning seems to be that God doesn't give "political" prophecies. Or that He doesn't prophesy against our politics: how could He, when our faction is on His "side" !?!?. But scripture shows, MASSIVELY and REPEATEDLY, He does.
I can't help being curious what Rob will do with discerning the word I gave him from God. If God wants me to know, I'm sure He'll let me know. But the point was obeying Him to give His word, and let it do His work, to His glory.
And AMEN !!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
But it’s probably not scripture-twisting to think of honesty as part of…or even roughly equivalent to…”integrity.” "Honest" may even be the general attitude and practice that scripture means by “righteousness.”
I have to think too of “honesty” as a response to Truth; which makes it specifically an orientation toward Christ. That “lies” are the contrary spirit and the contrary response seems to bear that out.
In Jesus’ parable, an “honest and good heart” is the only soil in which God’s word takes root and grows. I understand our interpretations of what God “speaks”…Truth/Jesus, scripture, reality…to be some of the “fruits” that grow from our heart-orientation: and honest and good interpretations only from an “honest and good heart.”
Certainly LACK of honesty seems the common characteristic of those who “cherry-pick” facts, or try to live in an echo-chamber of their own making, or block dissenting comments from their blogs. In all those instances, the individual's purpose is clearly to “validate” his own alternative "reality" against the reality God perfectly (in Hebrew, "completely") speaks.
I have to think those who choose to interpret the facts of reality dishonestly ultimately seek to deny God’s sovereignty: and in dishonest hubris, substitute their own.